If you are still unaware, Gilas Pilipinas has already released its 23-man pool where they would select their final roster that would compete in the 2019 FIBA World Cup Qualifiers (Asia) against Japan on November 24 and Chinese Taipei on November 27 of this year.
And as expected many did also have their own say on whom they would wish for the Final 12 — in which we actually considered 9 of their choices, namely: Andray Blatche, Jayson Castro, Terrence Romeo, RR Pogoy, Matthew Wright, Gabe Norwood, Troy Rosario, Raymond Almazan, and Japeth Aguilar while dropping out June Mar Fajardo, Kiefer Ravena and Calvin Abueva.
While Fajardo is a tall and talented 4-time PBA MVP — this basketball-loving country just has to accept that he is slow for international competitions. Maybe he could be useful against less talented teams but against much better ones, they could just play small ball to Gilas’ demise if Fajardo is on the floor.
Okay, Ravena may have lots of international experience — then again, those were just against fellow southeast Asians, weaker opponents or just in 3-on-3 tourneys — but just like Fajardo, he’s pretty slow. In fact, he’s interestingly slow for a player of his height. Comparing him to 6-foot players back then — Samboy Lim has some hang time which makes him tough to defend while his father, Bong Ravena, was quicker and more athletic than he was. With that, Kiefer’s attacks that were effective against most competition he has faced would, more often than not, find its way to the hoop only through luck especially against Australia whom they are also grouped with.
Now, Calvin Abueva. Despite his years in playing the game, he is still like awkward — he’s even got poor free-throw shooting; and the only thing that’s actually carrying him in the game is his rough style which suits the Filipino audience but surely not outside the country. Still, if only to choose between him and Ravena, he’d be a better choice since he’s a little taller while his roughness could somehow scare the opponents.
In the end, to achieve some measure of success, Gilas should learn to adapt to the international brand of play which is about speed and perimeter shooting more than post presence. And don’t forget defense. These then should be the guide in finalizing their lineup.
It’s been 3 years already and surely, many of you must have heretofore seen the movie Noah — what with the said Biblical epic almost tripling its box office returns against its budget! Still, it’s too controversial that it needs something like a follow-up, or some kind of reminder to humanity.
Their Synopsis. When God decides that mankind has become too sinful and must be wiped off the Earth, he chooses Noah (Russell Crowe), a pious man, for a great task. Noah must build an ark large enough to hold his wife (Jennifer Connelly), adopted daughter (Emma Watson), sons (Logan Lerman, Douglas Booth, Leo McHugh Carroll) and their wives — plus breeding pairs of every animal. When the task is completed, Noah and his family witness God’s wrath in the form of an apocalyptic flood.
Well, nothing’s wrong with the synopsis really. It’s what’s in the Bible save for one — there’s no mention of an adopted daughter but wives for each of them. Hence, what’s wrong is that writer, director and producer Darren Aronofsky did not really follow it — instead, he messed up the story! My, there’s just so many errors that this review would end up like a series just for us to tackle them all! And so, we decided to just go through some of the more glaring, otherwise, spiritually ‘endangering’ ones.
But before that, if you have read or heard of most of the reviews even during the film’s release, many of them in fact sang praises for the supposed artistry in Aronofsky. Like, he brought to life a timeless tale to fit the modern day.
What? Tale?? Sounds like God should not really be taken seriously that even a ‘modern day’ version could be adapted! Hey, even the Bible says, Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today and forever. (Heb 13:8) This means, God’s laws of yesterday still applies today and even tomorrow. It has never changed, never will. Else, there would have been 3 books — Old Testament, New Testament and Modern Testament. See? It’s man who only says he’s got a personal relationship with God — but then chooses to go with ‘modern day’ as some alibi to suit his perversion. As Jesus says, woe to you!
Anyway, the only thing Biblical in this film is the flood! Everything else, wrong. Basically. Read from Genesis chapter 6 and onwards.
The Bible did NOT mention that stone watchers or fallen angels helped build the ark. It was just Noah and his family who worked on it.
The Bible did NOT mention any violence or of preventing people to enter the ark — tho logic tells us that there could have been wailing during the flood.
NO ONE ELSE except Noah’s family along with the pairs of animals entered the ark before the flood. However, as we saw in the film, there was one who did; and even sparked hatred and betrayal between Ham and Noah?!
Noah’s family INCLUDES his wife, his 3 sons and their wives. Or 8 in all. In the film, only Noah and Shem had a wife, Ham doesn’t which made him leave the ark to look for one that Noah did not even approve of. Meanwhile, Japeth is not even an adult yet? Wow, look what messing up with the ‘roots’ bring!
Tho Methuselah died in the same year as the flood, there is NOTHING in the Bible that says he died during the flood which would have made him like an unbeliever. If so, this explains Methuselah’s supposed witchcraft in the film where he healed the ‘barren’ (??) wife of Shem. Else, he could have been the last believer outside of Noah and his family — where his ‘natural’ death was the final sign before the flood. Do NOT be confused — speculation only.
Most of all, Noah was NOT something like an uncaring, ‘mad man’ who even tried to kill his family as he ‘misunderstood’ (??) the command of God.
The cast played their roles well while the graphics were okay except for the stone watchers who looked like a joke. Meanwhile, the narration on the fall of Adam and Eve onto the multiplication and division of man through Cain and Seth were adequate. And if only the plot was not taken from the Bible, yes, it was creative; there were twists that it showed the good and dark side of a ‘chosen one’, who’s after all, still human.
Did Hollywood run out of stories when they thought of filming Noah and so turning it into the ‘Lord of the Rings’? Remember, when it comes to the Bible — NEVER change anything. Do as it says, and if ever you want to insert your creativity — tinker with graphics but NEVER the story.
Your soul — and the souls of weak faith — are at stake here, so do it right.
This movie about the Bible’s Queen Esther was actually released back in October 2006 and understandably so, with low box office returns of USD 13.7M against a budget of USD 20M — after all, it’s of a lesser known Bible character. Hmm.
Hence, even though Esther was a Queen and has her own book in the pages of the Holy Scripture — that’s in the Old Testament, after the Book of Nehemiah and before the Book of Job — she’s still relatively unknown particularly to those who does not really read the Bible.
Thus, it’s not surprising that producers of this film came up with an intriguing title — ONE NIGHT with the King which was, in fact, based on the novel Hadassah: One Night with the King by Tommy Tenney and Mark Andrew Olsen. Still, for real Christians, this should not be the case as the line became quite suggestive. Hey, Esther is not some one-night-stand girl! And how could people even make novels of such when we already have the ultimate reference in the Bible?? This would only discourage the world to open their Bibles even more, instead, just believe in what the movies or the novels say!
See? The producers themselves even acknowledged — like, the film added elements not present in the Biblical version as well as some non-Biblical ‘minor’ characters. Minor? Even the bite of an ant hurts, so be careful with that minor thing. Mind you, what good is a cool setting and pretty cinematography if you would only twist the Holy Scripture?
At any rate, this is the real story. Esther is one marked Biblical character who was noted for her bravery in stepping before the king to save her people and God’s chosen ones — the Jews — from being annihilated. Well, you know, especially during those times of kings and pharaohs, rules were strict. Like, if you approach the king without permission, you could be put to death. Thus, one should not just acknowledge authority like a god but really follow protocol as well — otherwise, you incur the wrath of the ruler, or be a target of his ‘ministers’ so to speak.
Now, before Esther came to be, there was Vashti, the queen; however, since she did not adhere to the King’s request, the search for a new queen was mandated — where, ultimately, Esther was chosen. In time, Haman whom the king has just promoted was angered at Mordecai (uncle of Esther) for not bowing to him; and so, his pride led him to scheme on destroying the Jews throughout the whole kingdom by trapping them with laws that he pointed or suggested to the king.
Eventually, it was Haman who got caught by his own wiles and was put to death while Mordecai was honored as Esther saved the Jews. So, see what ‘pride’ brings? This is very evident, more so, during these times — and this is why there’s discord around the world and even between family. And so, this ‘pride’ should be the moral of the story which should have been emphasized instead of screen-time issues between Esther and Haman.
In the end, remember that the Bible is Holy — do not try to commercialize any part of it. Instead, impart only the truth — and help fortify faith.
So, the Swiss Miss Martina Hingis and her doubles partner Chan Yung-jan of Taiwan has been on a tear as they have won 3 titles in the last 30 days — helping her regain the Women’s Doubles World Number One Ranking.
The 2017 US Open, the Wuhan Open and just hours ago, the China Open against Timea Babos (HUN) and Andrea Hlaváčková (CZE), 6-1, 6-4.
Wow, how hectic?! That’s like 3 tournaments in a month! And more so if you are aware that Hingis even participates in the Mixed Doubles — in fact, she along with Jamie Murray were crowned champions in this year’s US Open.
Well, Hingis’ latest jewel, the China Open is already her 64th career doubles title as she continues to build on her legacy which has spanned over 20 years since her heyday in the singles circuit. And by the way, did you know that she even became World Number One in Women’s Singles — 31 March 1997 — way ahead of tennis great Serena Williams (8 July 2002)? Yet Hingis is just a year older! However, nagging injuries as a consequence of competing at a tender age resulted in her retirement from singles play 10 years ago.
Incidentally, Hingis’ head-to-head matchup with Serena is 6-7, these were mostly close games though both had matches of sweeping each other. Yes, she’s not a power player but she’s a swift and cerebral one that’s armed with a great serve-and-volley game whom Serena and other top players may not have beaten if not for her ‘soft tissues’ — and consequently, lack of focus which was most likely due to her injury trauma.
Now, it seems Hingis is on a mission. And that is to rake in as many titles from the back door. The doubles play. Hey, if your body isn’t strong enough for the rigors of playing in the singles circuit then playing with a partner could still get the job done. Perhaps as the greatest doubles player??
As expected, Chooks-to-Go Pilipinas placed 5th in the recently concluded 2017 FIBA Asia Champions Cup in Chenzhou, China — that is after beating Mono Vampire BC of Thailand, 89-79, where import Isaiah Austin recorded 37 points, 15 boards, 6 assists and 6 blocks.
Austin’s domination was not surprising though, after all, Chooks already faced the Thais earlier and won, 115-102 — so, both teams are already familiar with each other; however this game though was like fighting for reputation especially for Austin and the rest of the Philippine team. So.
But then, was this ‘dominating’ game enough to say that Isaiah Austin has been a good pick-up for Chooks-to-Go, and for Gilas to build with? More so, who’s the better import — Austin or Andray Blatche? Hmm. One game is only one game and Austin’s 7-game Champions Cup stats and physical makeup says he’s just an ‘average’ import — who may not be strong and fast but could maneuver in the post, not bad in free throws, rebounds well enough and is a pretty decent rim protector. Of course, all of these with consideration to the kind of competition he has faced in Chenzhou, China.
Nonetheless, if only for experience then Andray Blatche gets the nod here what with seven years in the NBA as well as greater familiarity with what Gilas does. Then again and in the case of basketball, experience only matters in one’s first game; after that baptism of fire, the player’s performance now really depends on his skills, character and to some extent — luck.
Okay, as an import, what are you expected to do anyway? Everything?? Sigh* Then the coaching staff must be weak as they just rely on one man to do it all! Think about this. Recruitment should depend on needs. Evaluation must be based on one’s position. Watch him play — then evaluate.
You don’t send him home if he could not do more than 5 dribbles, if he’s no PG-SF! Nor should you get him if only for experience, for that could mean he’s worn out. Check him out first, his health, his interest, things like that before going to the necessary skills of his position in today’s game.
And so, for athleticism and scoring — whether inside or at the perimeter — we give it to Blatche. He’s stronger and could hit jumpers. As for rebounding, this goes to Austin who averaged 13 boards a game here. Defense? While Austin could block shots, he doesn’t really try to harass every shot within his reach but just relies on his height in wait. Blatche, meanwhile, uses his body. Still, both of them could be lazy at times, thus, this category is a tie.
This happened after Chooks-to-Go got trampled by China Kashgar last night, 70-86, in the 2017 FIBA Asia Champions Cup. Incidentally, even the day before that, Chooks-to-Go also got a beating from Iran’s Petrochimi, 66-87. Wow! More than having a soft and slow import in Austin, guess Pilipinas is just not coached well. And Chot Reyes can’t just blame the PBA for not lending their players, after all, other participating teams also didn’t have their best locals. Thus, this tourney was all about a coach’s strategy and getting the right import to fit into it — which they obviously failed on both accounts.
Problem is — Pride. Time and again, that is even before this FIBA debacle, Philippine basketball coaches and supporters would rather live in fantasy by praising their little success than working or dealing with what they really need to do for greater glory. Put down that pride and hire a consultant, not those regular faces you see or hear (not even these regular commentators, they are biased and lacks real insight) but someone with a 3D-like knowledge of the game — an outsider and not even necessarily a foreigner. Come to think of it, their previous successes just actually had a lot to do with luck which ran out when they got blasted by South Korea, 118-86 in the quarterfinals of the 2017 FIBA Asia Cup in Lebanon last August.
Ey, they basically had their best team! And so ‘pride’ tells them that they were just upset instead of admitting or understanding how they really got beat — for which they are only like pointing to missing an import that caused their loss. Hmm. With that, expect them to fall short again in the future.
Now back to the Champions Cup. In their two successive spankings and as usual, we saw Chooks-to-Go Pilipinas go to Austin (v Petrochimi 9/20, v China 5/12) and Ravena (v Petrochimi 7/14, v China 6/14) with Cruz also having more than 10 attempts (4/14) against China. Okay, while Austin and Ravena have been pretty consistent as we could see in their FG percentages — for others who have shot at least 10 times were just up and down, like Cruz. One day he’s cold, next day he’s hot, and then he’s cold again. Clearly, that’s not deserving of the confidence given by a coach.
But like what we have previously said a couple of articles ago, Jett Manuel specifically should have been given the green light to shoot. He’s got the offensive weapons, he just doesn’t have enough touches.
Anyway, we do expect the Filipinos to win this battle for 5th place.
After 3 straight games, it’s a rest day today for the Philippine men’s basketball team that’s competing in Chenzhou, China — where Chooks-to-Go Pilipinas first won against BC Astana (73-65) then lost to Sareyyet Ramallah (82-89) before winning yesterday against Thailand’s Mono Vampire BC (115-102).
Next game would be tomorrow, September 26 at 9:45PM, against Petrochimi of Iran. And since we have already talked about the Filipinos against the Kazakhs, let’s now get on to their recent two games.
82-89 AGAINST SAREYYET RAMALLAH
While it was good to see two other guys, Jeron Teng (5/12) and Carl Bryan Cruz (3/11) — other than Isaiah Austin and Kiefer Ravena — firing more than 10 shots in their game, their assists were still low at only 10. More so, while most areas were as close as it could be — the Palestinians were actually the ones ahead on those stats. And Chooks-to-Go can’t just blame poor 3-point shooting (PHL 5/28, PLE 10/26) because they even had more free throws (PHL 23/30, PLE 11/16) compared to their opponent — so that cancels out the downtown percentage excuse.
In short, the Philippines lost simply because the Palestinians had control of the ball game even as the time one was leading explains it — which was 35 minutes of the way for Sareyyet as to only 3 minutes by Chooks-to-Go.
115-102 AGAINST MONO VAMPIRE BC
It’s amazing that the Philippines beat the Thais who defeated the Palestinians who were the conquerors of the Filipinos. Did you get it? What a merry-go-round! But that’s how it has been, one night you’re cold, next day you’re hot.
This stuff was in full display in Carl Bryan Cruz who was just 3-of-11 against the Palestinians but was red hot against the Thais shooting 8-of-11 from 3s. And with 4 of their players in double figures, with 3 even in the 20s, it didn’t really matter here if the Filipinos had 19 turnovers as they had their highest assist total so far with 22 while having more points in the paint 46-32.
All these only confirmed why they led for 39 minutes of the game.. and won.